AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() ![]() ![]() Adding to the confusion is the fact that state and local governments have passed laws criminalizing thousands of behaviors. Justice Department estimates that there are approximately 5,000 federal crimes, but since these offenses are scattered among 23,000 pages of Federal Code, no one is sure of the precise number or which laws are still in effect. Even though Durkheim was writing at a time when Western societies were much smaller and technologically simpler than now, his point still applies. On empirical grounds, he said that because complex societies require so many laws, it is inevitable that someone is likely to break one. Émile Durkheim on Crime and PunishmentĪccording to Durkheim, crime is normal for several reasons. How can crime be functional when it harms people, property, and the community? We now address that question and expand on Durkheim’s explanations for crime and punishment. He asserted, as we mentioned at the outset of this chapter, that crime is normal because it is functional. It seems that many of the perspectives simply don’t apply to it, and those that do only seem to apply at the most general level.Émile Durkheim helped to develop what is now called functionalism. Hate Crime is a difficult crime to understand. Possibly hate crime is a reaction to the increased relative deprivation and a feeling of marginalisation experienced by the perpetrators? Maybe they feel as if everything ‘diverse’ and ‘minority’ is being celebrated and has a place in British Culture but that more traditional British culture now has no place? So maybe there’s a possible application of Left Realism to be made here. This does seem to be a very postmodern crime – in that it’s a negative response to the increased visibility of minority groups and the increase in Diversity in British culture in recent years, although this is a very general level of theoretical explanation. Rational Choice Theory (from Right Realism) could partially explain hate crime – possibly some of the perpetrators feel as if there’s little chance of them being caught harassing their victims because the ‘general public sentiment’ is on their side, so they won’t be reported. There’s hardly a moral panic against the LGBT community for example! However, this doesn’t explain hate-crimes agains other religions or minority groups. It’s possible to apply Interactionism to help understand religiously motivated crime motivated by Islamophobia, given the general negative press coverage of Islam, focussing mainly on infrequent terror attacks when they happen. Similarly with other consensus theories: there’s little evidence that a breakdown of social control, a strain in society, or of subcultures being significant causal factors (at least no more than with any other type of crime) of hate crime… many of these crimes are committed by lone individuals. You’d probably have a hard time trying to apply Functionalism, for example: by definition these crimes are divisive, and a reflection of conflict in society, rather than social integration, and it’s hard to see how this particular type of crime could be regarded as functional for society or in any way positive. Many of the earlier perspectives seem pretty ineffective at explaining this type of crime. Thus it’s possibly best to reject the Police Recorded Crime Stats as being invalid as a measurement of the total amount of Hate Crime committed, given that around 50% of CSEW Hate Crimes are not picked up by the police. However, the 2018-19 Crime Survey for England and Wales shows a decline in Hate Crime the estimated number of hate crime incidents experienced by adults aged 16 has fell by 40 percent from 307,000 in the combined 2007//09 surveys to 184,000 in the combined 2015/16, 2016//18 surveys. ![]() Police recorded Hate Crime reports that there were 103,379 Hate Crimes in England and Wales in 2018/19, an increase of 50% over the last five years: Trends in hate crime vary significantly depending on where you get your data… then the police must record the act as a hate crime. Hate crimes typically include any of the following acts motivated by ‘hatred’ against any of the above characteristics….Īll of these crimes can also be committed in general, but if a victim feels they were motivated by hatred of their religion or gender identity etc. However this is not an exhaustive list and hate crimes can also be committed on the basis of age or gender, and there are calls to include misogyny (hatred of women) as a hate crime. There are five main characteristics which the police monitor…. ‘Any criminal offence which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice towards someone based on a personal characteristic.’ ( Hate Crime, England and Wales, 2018-19). ![]() Sociological Perspectives on Hate Crime. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |